Metamorphosis

In Physics by Brian Koberlein3 Comments

Neutrinos are rather odd particles. They interact only weakly with matter, come in three different types or flavors, and while they have mass they don’t have definite mass. They can also change between different types of neutrinos, a process known as neutrino oscillation. Much of the evidence for neutrino oscillation has been indirect, but new research has made a direct observation of the effect.

Neutrino oscillation was first proposed in the 1960s to explain what was known as the solar neutrino problem. That is, the number of solar neutrinos we detected on Earth was about a third the expected number given theoretical reaction rates. It wasn’t until the late 1990s that we obtained evidence of neutrino oscillation. This was done by creating a beam of neutrinos with a particle accelerator such as the ones at Fermilab or CERN, and beaming these neutrinos through the Earth to an underground neutrino detector some distance away. By controlling the energy of the neutrino beam we can predict the number of expected detections expected both with or without neutrino oscillation. Experiments have consistently been in agreement with the oscillation model.

But one criticism of these experiments is that they are indirect evidence of neutrino oscillation. Basically they involved sending a particular number of a particular type of neutrino such as electron or muon neutrinos, and then detecting the drop in neutrinos at the underground site. According to the oscillation model, this drop is due to the fact that a portion of the neutrinos have metamorphosed into other neutrino types that aren’t detected. It would be better to actually detect the neutrinos that have changed rather than simply inferring their change. That’s exactly what’s been done in this new work.

A group observed a beam of muon neutrinos from CERN and detected the tau neutrinos some of them transformed into. The results clearly show that muon neutrinos can transform into tau neutrinos. A similar group working with the Super-Kamiokande neutrino detector observed electron neutrinos from a muon neutrino beam. So we now have directed evidence of neutrino oscillation.

Paper: N. Agafonova, et al. Observation of tau neutrino appearance in the CNGS beam with the OPERA experiment. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 101C01 doi: 10.1093/ptep/ptu132 (2014)

Paper: K. Abe et al. Observation of Electron Neutrino Appearance in a Muon Neutrino Beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 061802 (2014)

Comments

  1. Does this result say anything about the likelihood of existence of sterile neutrinos?

    Also, are there any parameters in the “SM+neutrino oscillation” model that are as yet unmeasured?

  2. how exactly do particle accelerators create neutrinos? And isn’t it hard to “aim” them to point to some observatory on the other side of the planet?

    1. They used to have CERN point high-speed protons at a metal target, and some of the collisions there had neutrinos coming out of them. The proton beam was directed toward OPERA, so the ricocheting neutrinos had roughly the same direction by conservation of momentum. All of the other reaction products were absorbed along the 800km of rock between source and detector.

      But that particular neutrino beam (CGNS) only ran from 2005 to 2012, and I’m not sure what they’re using now.

Leave a Reply